MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965730303 · doi:10.1109/tec.2019.2932381

Unified Solver Based Real-Time Multi-Domain Simulation of Aircraft Electro-Mechanical-Actuator

2019· article· en· W2965730303 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhen Huang, Chengcheng Tang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsSolverActuatorComputer scienceComponent (thermodynamics)Key (lock)Domain (mathematical analysis)Time domainControl engineeringProcess (computing)Field-programmable gate arrayPower (physics)SimulationEngineeringEmbedded systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electro-mechanical-actuator (EMA) is the key component to convert electrical power into mechanical power for flight control in next-generation aircrafts. Multi-domain simulation of EMA can benefit its on-going evolution process. This paper presents the real-time multi-domain modeling and simulation of an EMA as elevator for flight control by utilization of a unified solver. Several key issues concerning the computational efficiency and successful implementation of this solver are provided and its relationship with state-variable model is also elaborated. Analysis shows that this solver could be a competitive candidate for multi-domain simulation because of its high computational efficiency and relatively less modeling effort. Electrical, mechanical, and thermal parts of the EMA are modeled and simulated interactively based on the proposed solver. The multi-domain model is implemented on FPGA board and executes in real time. Simulation results from FPGA board and commercial softwares under several test scenarios coincide with each other in very high degree, which showcases the efficacy of the proposed solver with respect to computational efficiency and ability to accommodate multi-domain models. The proposed model and solver are useful for hardware-in-the-loop design and testing of EMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207