Regional transcriptional architecture of Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis and network spread
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although a significant genetic contribution to the risk of developing sporadic Parkinson's disease has been well described, the relationship between local genetic factors, pathogenesis, and subsequent spread of pathology throughout the brain has been largely unexplained in humans. To address this question, we use network diffusion modelling to infer probable pathology seed regions and patterns of disease spread from MRI atrophy maps derived from 232 de novo subjects in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative study. Allen Brain Atlas regional transcriptional profiles of 67 Parkinson's disease risk factor genes were mapped to the inferred seed regions to determine the local influence of genetic risk factors. We used hierarchical clustering and L1 regularized regression analysis to show that transcriptional profiles of immune-related and lysosomal risk factor genes predict seed region location and the pattern of disease propagation from the most likely seed region, substantia nigra. By leveraging recent advances in transcriptomics, we show that regional microglial abundance quantified by high fidelity gene expression also predicts seed region location. These findings suggest that early disease sites are genetically susceptible to dysfunctional lysosomal α-synuclein processing and microglia-mediated neuroinflammation, which may initiate the disease process and contribute to spread of pathology along neural connectivity pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".