MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965784270

제네릭브랜드의 노자 실용주의적 고찰 - 노브랜드와 무인양품 비교를 중심으로 -

2019· article· ko· W2965784270 on OpenAlex
황현택

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue상품문화디자인학연구(구 한국상품문화디자인학회 논문집) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPragmatismCapitalismBrand equityAdvertisingProfit (economics)EmptinessBrand awarenessValue (mathematics)Brand managementFunction (biology)MarketingBusinessEconomicsNeoclassical economicsEpistemologyMathematicsPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

National brand made change at advent of generic brand of which birth and development were based on principle of capitalism market. Nature of generic brand and consumers' selection were difficult to explain by economic efficiency. This study explained difference between American pragmatism and Laozi's practicalism, and investigated stops by itself and satisfaction(知足), emptiness(虛) and inactivity(無爲) and described difference between No Brand and MUJI brand. First, not only generic brand but also no brand with Western pragmatism philosophy thought much of value of profit of maximum efficiency in capitalism society to say stops by itself and satisfaction of Laozi. Second, brand naming of No Brand rejected brand in favor of consumers, and naming said emptiness of function of article. Third, package design of No Brand was common like no name in Canada to follow universal design looking for function, and package design of MUJI showed effort of inactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it