Structural Damage Identification Under Temperature Variations Based on PSO–CS Hybrid Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the variations in parameters to detect structural damages has been widely used in damage identification of structures. When exposed to varying temperatures, not only the displacements and stresses of a structure will change, but also the elastic modulus of the materials, such as concrete and steel, of which the structure is made. Since the variation in elastic modulus will result in the variation of the stiffness of the structure, a damage identification method without considering the temperature effects is, in principle, unacceptable. In this study, a damage identification method using the particle swarm optimization combined with the cuckoo search (PSO–CS) under the noise and temperature environment is proposed. First, the temperature variations are combined with the elastic modulus variation for addressing the temperature effects in finite element model. Second, a PSO–CS hybrid algorithm is adopted, which applies the updated mechanism of PSO in CS. Third, objective functions comprised of different modal messages with diverse weight coefficients are constructed for the damage identification and validated by numerical analysis of a simply supported beam. The results show that the performance of the PSO–CS is better than either PSO or CS individually. Finally, the PSO–CS is applied to the damage identification of ASCE Benchmark frame, for which the results indicate a satisfactory accuracy of the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".