MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965916334 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2019.2927541

A Differential Push-Pull Voltage Mode VCSEL Driver in 65-nm CMOS

2019· article· en· W2965916334 on OpenAlexafffund
Ajith Sivadhasan Ramani, Spoorthi Nayak, Sudip Shekhar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSemtech (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVertical-cavity surface-emitting laserCMOSParasitic extractionDiodeElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceLaserEngineeringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving power-conversion efficiency (PCE) of VCSEL drivers is paramount to improve the overall energy efficiency of the entire optical link for high-performance computing and data centers. VCSEL diodes are normally driven single-ended with pseudo-differential current-mode drivers to maintain signal integrity. However, such conventional drivers consume significant power and are often unable to compensate for supply switching noise due to package parasitics at high data-rates. We propose a differential push-pull voltage-mode VCSEL driver to mitigate bondwire parasitics, reduce power consumption, and leverage CMOS process scaling to its maximum advantage. A proof-of-concept prototype in 65-nm CMOS process achieves the highest ever-reported PCE of 18.7 % for VCSEL drivers when normalized to VCSEL slope efficiency. It uses an asymmetric 3-tap rise and fall-based pre-emphasis to achieve a total energy/bit of 1.52 pJ/b at 16 Gb/s with an average optical power output of 1.34 dBm, OMA of 2.1 dBm, and extinction ratio of 5.92 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207