MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965924079 · doi:10.15278/isms.2019.tj06

MICROWAVE SPECTROSCOPIC AND THEORETICAL EXAMINATION OF ALLYL ISOTHIOCYANATE CONFORMATIONAL SPACE

2019· article· en· W2965924079 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Stitsky, Jennifer van Wijngaarden, Weslley Silva, Wenhao Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 74th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllyl isothiocyanateSpace (punctuation)MicrowaveIsothiocyanateMaterials sciencePhysicsChemistryComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A spectroscopic analysis of allyl isothiocyanate \\chem{(CH_2=CHCH_2NCS)} was conducted via chirped-pulse and Balle-Flygare Fourier Transform microwave (FTMW) spectroscopy in the 7-25 GHz range. Rotational transitions associated with the different conformers were assigned based on information gathered from quantum-chemical calculations computed at B3LYP-D3(BJ) and MP2 levels of theory using the Dunning cc-pVTZ basis set. The results showed the existence of two conformers, the gauche conformer, which was reported in previous work\\footnote{Maiti, S.; Jaman, A. I.; Nandi, R. N. \\textit{J. Mol. Spectrosc.} \\textbf{165} (1994), 168-172 } as well as the first reported existence of a second conformer which corresponds to the global minimum. Spectroscopic assignments included transitions due to both parent conformers, $^{34}$S, $^{13}$C and $^{15}$N singly substituted isotopic species as well as hyperfine splitting due to the presence of $^{14}$N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 74th International Symposium on Molecular SpectroscopySame topicOptical and Acousto-Optic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207