MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2965925640 · doi:10.29173/cais915

Development of a Digital Library Infrastructure for the North: An Environmental Scanning Approach

2016· article· fr· W2965925640 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Shiri, Dinesh Rathi, Robyn Stobbs, Sandy Campbell, Sharon Farnel, Cathy Cockney, Elaine Maloney

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographySettlement (finance)HumanitiesPolitical scienceComputer scienceArtWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on an ongoing project: thedevelopment of an environmental scanning model asa basis for the creation of a digital libraryinfrastructure for the Inuvialuit Settlement Region inCanada’s north. The model is proposed as a novelapproach to community-focused digital librarydevelopment and the paper also presents keyemerging findings from the use of environmental scanmodel.Cette étude rend compte d’un projet en cours : ledéveloppement d’un modèle d’analyse del’environnement comme base pour la création d’uneinfrastructure de bibliothèque numérique destinée àla région d’établissement Inuvialuit dans le Nordcanadien. Le modèle est proposé comme unenouvelle approche pour le développement d’unebibliothèque numérique axé sur la communauté etl’étude présente également les principaux résultatsissus de l’utilisation du modèle d’analyse del’environnement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI→Same topicIndigenous Studies and Ecology→French-language works237,207→