Bibliographic record
Abstract
En prenant l’exemple d’Y penser sans cesse de Marie NDiaye et de Denis Cointe, l’auteure démontre l’influence mutuelle du visuel et du textuel, ainsi que les divers échanges possibles entre les supports artistiques. Tentant de comprendre les échanges intermédiaux au sein de cette collaboration artistique qui a donné lieu à un objet livresque et filmique, l’auteure décèle trois moments fantomatiques, mettant en lumière une présence-absence oscillant entre les supports : l’effacement identitaire des corps du textuel et du visuel ; le langage du portrait qui pénètre l’œuvre ; les pliages temporels qui imitent la logique du fantôme. Une véritable œuvre polymorphe, Y penser sans cesse témoigne d’une hantise intermédiale, car elle à la fois annonce et cache les thèmes, corps, lieux et même créateurs grâce aux rapports complexes, fugitifs et surtout fantomatiques entre la poésie, la voix, la photographie et le film.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".