Development of Bio-Based Chitosan Films with Incorporated Chestnut Extract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydrolysable tannins have prominent biological activity and thus their industrial application is gaining importance in many fields.This study explored the possibility for the utilization of a commercially available chestnut extract (CE) as an active component in chitosan-based films intended for food packaging.Therefore, a set of chitosan-based films with incorporated CE was prepared and evaluated regarding physicochemical properties.The estimated total phenolic content (TPC) has revealed a maximal value of 19.5 mgGAE gfilm -1 .Moreover, the moisture content (MC) in the films has decreased (from 29.6% to 18.6%), while tensile strength (TS) has increased (from 13.5 MPa to 48.5 MPa) after the incorporation of CE.The observed coherence between TPC and evaluated properties has been confirmed by the existence of strong negative and positive linear correlations in the case of MC and TS, respectively.In large, CE extract was found to be a promising candidate as an active component in chitosan-based films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".