MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966042986 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2015.2450236

Rényi Entropy Filter for Anomaly Detection With Eddy Current Remote Field Sensors

2015· article· en· W2966042986 on OpenAlexafffund
Sheikhi Farid, Davide Spinello, Wail Gueaieb

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFedDev Ontario
KeywordsAnomaly detectionEntropy (arrow of time)ThresholdingArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Mobile robotFilter (signal processing)Raw dataData miningRemote sensingComputer visionRobotPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a multichannel remote field eddy current sensor apparatus, which is installed on a mobile robot deployed in pipelines with the mission of detecting defects. Features in raw sensory data that are associated with defects could be masked by noise and therefore difficult to identify in some instances. In order to enhance these features that potentially identify defects, we propose an entropy filter that maps raw sensory data points into a local entropy measure. In the entropy space, data are then classified by means of a thresholding procedure based on the Neyman-Pearson criterion. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated by applying it to different data sets obtained from field trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207