MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966042986 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2015.2450236

Rényi Entropy Filter for Anomaly Detection With Eddy Current Remote Field Sensors

2015· article· en· W2966042986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFedDev Ontario
KeywordsAnomaly detectionEntropy (arrow of time)ThresholdingArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Mobile robotFilter (signal processing)Raw dataData miningRemote sensingComputer visionRobotPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a multichannel remote field eddy current sensor apparatus, which is installed on a mobile robot deployed in pipelines with the mission of detecting defects. Features in raw sensory data that are associated with defects could be masked by noise and therefore difficult to identify in some instances. In order to enhance these features that potentially identify defects, we propose an entropy filter that maps raw sensory data points into a local entropy measure. In the entropy space, data are then classified by means of a thresholding procedure based on the Neyman-Pearson criterion. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated by applying it to different data sets obtained from field trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it