Spectacularisation urbaine et logement social : la place des Habitations Jeanne-Mance dans le Quartier des spectacles de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Situées au cœur du Quartier des Spectacles à Montréal, les Habitations Jeanne-Mance constituent un vaste ensemble de logements sociaux qui contraste avec la vitrine culturelle de la métropole québécoise. Pourtant, au-delà des différences de fonction, il se déploie dans ces projets urbains des pratiques d’embellissement analogues. Bien que l’on observe un recours à l’art public et la culture dans les deux cas, ces opérations d’embellissement prennent des formes différentes : destinées à attirer des publics dans le Quartier des Spectacles, elles cherchent plutôt à renforcer, dans le cas des Habitations Jeanne-Mance, le sentiment d’appartenance des 1 700 résidents qui y habitent. Entre la spectacularisation et l’esthétisation urbaine, nous proposons d’analyser dans cet article comment s’imbriquent et s’articulent ces opérations de recodage symbolique pour comprendre comment se négocient actuellement les frontières qui séparent ces deux territoires, et in fine, comment se dessine l’avenir de cet ensemble d’habitation moderniste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".