A 1D Compression Model for Loess Based on Disturbed State Concept
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite being insufficiently compacted, the loess structure can withstand a huge load like the super solid. This paper attempts to disclose how water content affects the bonding and arrangement of loess particles, and how it disturbs the loess structure. For this purpose, five confined compression tests are designed for intact loess and remolded loess of different water contents. Specifically, the disturbance function was defined with void ratio as the parameter based on the disturbed state concept (DSC) theory, considering how the structural features of loess Q3 affects the compressive strength. Next, the evolution law of the disturbance function was explored, and the influence law of water content on the parameters of the disturbance function was investigated. Finally, a DSC-based 1D compression model was constructed for loess Q3. The research results show that the water content has a great impact on the evolution law of the 1D disturbance function and its two parameters, and the influence can be described by exponential function. Besides, the experimental results show that our model can accurately describe how water content affects loess compression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it