MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966130489 · doi:10.1039/c9cc03969d

Tunable functionalization of silica coated iron oxide nanoparticles achieved through a silanol–alcohol condensation reaction

2019· article· en· W2966130489 on OpenAlexafffund
Henry J. H. Kang, Rana Faryad Ali, Michael T. Y. Paul, Melissa J. Radford, Irene Andreu, Austin W. H. Lee, Byron D. Gates

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyBurnaby HospitalSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCMC Microsystems
KeywordsSilanolSurface modificationCondensationNanoparticleAlcoholMaterials scienceOxideCondensation reactionIron oxide nanoparticlesChemical engineeringPhotochemistryNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryInorganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface properties of nanoparticles play an important role in their interactions with their surroundings. Silane reagents have been used for surface modifications to silica shells on iron oxide nanoparticles, but using these reagents presents some challenges. An alternative approach to modifying the surfaces of these silica shells was developed to impart different terminal functional groups, such as a thiol, alcohol, or carboxylic acid, through the use of alcohol-based reagents. This approach to surface functionalization of the core-shell particles was verified through chemical analyses and the attachment of gold nanoparticles. The use of the silanol-alcohol condensation reaction could be extended further to other surface functionalizations through the use of additional alcohol-based reagents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicMesoporous Materials and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207