MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Postprandial Hypertriglyceridaemia Revisited in the Era of Non-fasting Lipid Profiles: Executive Summary of a 2019 Expert Panel Statement

2019· review· en· W2966150781 on OpenAlex
Genovefa Kolovou, Gerald F. Watts, Dimitri P. Mikhailidis, Pablo Pérez‐Martínez, Samia Mora, Helen Bilianou, George Panotopoulos, Niki Katsiki, Teik Chye Ooi, José López‐Miranda, Anne Tybjærg‐Hansen, Nikolaοs Tentolouris, Børge G. Nordestgaard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Vascular Pharmacology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicinePostprandialStatement (logic)HypertriglyceridemiaInternal medicineMEDLINETriglycerideCholesterolBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keywords: Postprandial lipaemia, non-fasting triglycerides, chylomicron remnants, very low-density lipoprotein remnants, remnant cholesterol, fat tolerance test, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it