Seamless Tracking of Apparent Point and Extended Targets Using Gaussian Process PMHT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In practical target tracking scenarios, targets of different sizes (or extents) may be near or far away from the sensor, which may result in targets appearing as point sources or as extended targets spanning one or more resolution cells, respectively, depending on distance and sensor resolution. In this paper, a new Gaussian Process (GP) measurement model is proposed to explicitly describe the observation about each basis point of GP by an individual dynamic Poisson measurement rate. By employing this model, a novel algorithm to track multiple point targets and extended targets, simultaneously and seamlessly, in the presence of clutter and missed detections is proposed within the Probabilistic Multi-Hypothesis Tracker (PMHT) framework. The proposed algorithm can adapt to spatio-temporally varying target sizes or extents of extended targets and temporally varying target cardinality. In addition, the posterior Cramer-Rao lower bound (PCRLB) for extended targets, which quantifies the accuracies of estimates of multiple extended target states in scenarios with clutter, is derived. Simulations with a scenario consisting of multiple extended targets and point targets are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and to compare its performance with the extended target PCRLB and with those of existing extended target tracking algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it