MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966200385 · doi:10.1109/seh.2019.00021

Multiple Depth Sensor Setup and Synchronization for Marker-Less 3D Human Foot Tracking in a Hallway

2019· article· en· W2966200385 on OpenAlexaff
Vinod Gutta, Natalie Baddour, Pascal Fallavollita, Edward D. Lemaire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronizingPoint cloudComputer scienceComputer visionSynchronization (alternating current)Artificial intelligenceTracking (education)AnimationMotion captureDepth mapImage sensorComputer graphics (images)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, an animation was designed to determine an appropriate physical setup for depth sensors in an institutional hallway, for human foot surface capture and tracking. The sensor configuration was tested by creating the setup in a laboratory with Intel RealSense D415 depth cameras, synchronizing multiple depth sensors (spatially and temporal), collecting depth camera data, and generating a point cloud of a person walking in the capture area. Simulations showed that 96% of a walking human's foot surface can be reconstructed from depth sensors data, using sets of four diagonal corner locations for each instance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207