MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966243061 · doi:10.1080/02699052.2019.1644375

Multi-parametric analysis reveals metabolic and vascular effects driving differences in BOLD-based cerebrovascular reactivity associated with a history of sport concussion

2019· article· en· W2966243061 on OpenAlexaff
Allen A. Champagne, Nicole S. Coverdale, Michael Germuska, Douglas J. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Injury · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of NottinghamWellcome Trust
KeywordsConcussionMedicineCerebral blood flowHemodynamicsAthletesCardiologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPoison controlPhysical therapyRadiologyInjury preventionEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Identify alterations in cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) based on the history of sport-related concussion (SRC). Further explore possible mechanisms underlying differences in vascular physiology using hemodynamic parameters modeled using calibrated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Method: End-tidal targeting and dual-echo MRI were combined to probe hypercapnic and hyperoxic challenges in athletes with (n = 32) and without (n = 31) a history of SRC. Concurrent blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) data were used to compute BOLD-CVR, ASL-CVR, and other physiological parameters including resting oxygen extraction fraction (OEF0) and cerebral blood volume (CBV0). Multiple linear and logistic regressions were then used to identify dominant parameters driving group-differences in BOLD-CVR.Results: Robust evidence for elevated BOLD-CVR were found in athletes with SRC history spreading over parts of the cortical hemispheres. Follow-up analyses showed co-localized differences in ASL-CVR (representing modulation of cerebral blood flow) and hemodynamic factors representing static vascular (i.e., CBV0) and metabolic (i.e., OEF0) effects suggesting that group-based differences in BOLD-CVR may be driven by a mixed effect from factors with vascular and metabolic origins.Conclusion: These results emphasize that while BOLD-CVR offers promises as a surrogate non-specific biomarker for cerebrovascular health following SRC, multiple hemodynamic parameters can affect its relative measurements.Abbreviations: [dHb]: concentration of deoxyhemoglobin; AFNI: Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (https://afni.nimh.nih.gov); ASL: arterial spin labeling; BIG: position group: defensive and offensive linemen; BIG-SKILL: position group: full backs, linebackers, running backs, tight-ends; BOLD: blood oxygen level dependent; CBF: cerebral blood flow; CMRO2: cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption; CTL: group of control subjects; CVR: cerebrovascular reactivity; fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; FSL: FMRIB software library (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/); HC: hypercapnia; HO: hyperoxia; HX: group with history of concussion; M: maximal theoretical BOLD signal upon complete removal of venous dHb; pCASL: pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling; PETCO2: end-tidal carbon dioxide; PETO2: end-tidal oxygen; SCAT: sport-concussion assessment tool; SKILL: position group: defensive backs, kickers, quarterbacks, safeties, wide-receivers; SRC: sport-related concussion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain InjurySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207