MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966266863

Integrating Factorization Ranked Features in MCTS: An Experimental Study.

2016· article· en· W2966266863 on OpenAlexaff
Chenjun Xiao, Martin Müller

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Games
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRanking (information retrieval)FactorizationComputer scienceFactor (programming language)Feature (linguistics)Tree (set theory)Artificial intelligenceMonte Carlo tree searchMachine learningMonte Carlo methodOpen sourceState (computer science)Data miningAlgorithmStatisticsSoftwareMathematicsProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, Factorization Bradley-Terry (FBT) model is introduced for fast move prediction in the game of Go. It has been shown that FBT outperforms the state-of-the-art fast move prediction system of Latent Factor Ranking (LFR). In this paper, we investigate the problem of integrating feature knowledge learned by FBT model in Monte Carlo Tree Search. We use the open source Go program Fuego as the test platform. Experimental results show that the FBT knowledge is useful in improving the performance of Fuego.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicArtificial Intelligence in GamesFrench-language works237,207