Gli accordi commerciali e l’Italia: il caso del CETA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’UE ha sempre fatto uso di accordi bilaterali nei rapporti con i paesi terzi ma, nell’ultimo decennio in concomitanza con le difficoltà incontrate dal Doha Round dell’Organizzazione Mondiale del Commercio, questo tipo di accordi ha rappresentato lo strumento principale della politica commerciale europea. Si tratta di una tendenza comune anche ad altri paesi, tuttavia l’UE si distingue per il numero e la profondità degli accordi raggiunti. Il presente studio è dedicato all’Accordo economico e commerciale globale (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA) tra UE e Canada, per ora applicato in modalità provvisoria in attesa della ratifica da parte degli Stati Membri.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it