MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966300607 · doi:10.4000/assr.45272

Nathan Weinstock, 1891-1907 : le mouvement sioniste découvre l’existence des Arabes de Palestine

2018· article· fr· W2966300607 on OpenAlexaff
Aline Schlaepfer

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives de sciences sociales des religions · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsCollège de Maisonneuve
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalestineMedicinePhilosophyAncient historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comment les sionistes du temps de la premiere aliya ont-ils traite de la question palestinienne ? Ils l’ont entierement occultee, assureront certains. « Un peuple sans terre pour une terre sans peuple. » D’autres repondront que si la rhetorique de la terre sans peuple a certes longtemps persiste dans les milieux sionistes, il n’en demeure pas moins qu’au tournant du xxe siecle deja, on publiait des essais visant a ouvrir un debat sur cette question. C’est le parti que prend Nathan Weinstock d...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives de sciences sociales des religionsSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207