MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966386049 · doi:10.33524/cjar.v19i2.382

…AND LOSE THE NAME OF ACTION

2018· article· en· W2966386049 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kurt W. Clausen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Action Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureAction (physics)WifeVisual artsLiteratureAnimeArtHistoryMedia studiesPsychologyAdvertisingSociologyArt historyLawPhilosophyLinguisticsPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Like most kids of the McLuhan generation, I have vivid memories of images from television. Alongside the many comedies and adventure shows I watched, I remember commercials as miniature sagas conveniently repeated every half hour in case I missed them the first time. Sometimes, they involved an action-packed 30 seconds of Kool-Aid jugs crashing through brick walls or otherwise mild mannered men applying Hai Karate to become Kung Fu masters. Interspersed with these small vignettes, came the voice of Victor Kiam. In a fatherly way, he talked about using an electric shaver that his wife had given him and would close by saying “I liked it so much, I bought the company.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.297
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Action ResearchSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207