ANXIETY AND DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS IN PATIENTS WITH CRANIOCERVICAL DYSTONIA: CLINICAL AND ANAMNESTIC FEATURES AND MODIFYING ROLE OF BOTULINUM TOXIN THERAPY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study included 54 patients with cranio-cervical dystonia, 38 (70.4%) of whom were women, 16 (29.6%) - men, mean age 49,8 ± 11,3 years. 32 patients were diagnosed with cervical dystonia, groups with blepharospasm and Meige’s syndrome included 11 patients respectively. All patients were screened by «Unified Dystonia Rating Scale» and those who had cervical dystonia also by «Toronto western spasmodic torticollis rating scale (TWSTRS)». Psychoemotional state in these patients was examined by Beck depression inventory (BDI) and Hamilton’s anxiety rating scale (HAM-A). Depression and anxiety occurrence and severity was evaluated, impact of different factors including Botulinum toxin treatment was observed. Results of the study confirmed that anxiety and depressive disorders are associated with craniocervical dystonia. Sex, localization of dystonia, disease duration, and satisfaction with the treatment do not affect significantly severity of anxiety and depression. Regular injections of Botulinum toxin significantly decrease severity of psychoemotional disorders in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".