Creando Geografías: Una exploración al Territorio Integral y Memoria en la Protesta Indígena
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El estudio de la relación entre memoria y geografía se ha enfocado principalmente en el rol del espacio construido (museos, monumentos, lugares históricos, y artefactos) en la producción de sitios de conmemoración, así como en el uso del espacio a través de representaciones o rituales para (re)crear memorias o contra-memorias por parte de grupos sociales. La reconstrucción y recuperación de un ‘territorio integral’ entre los pueblos amazónicos del Perú, que ellos describen como su manera ancestral de vivir, hoy es también un proyecto moderno para definir y reafirmar el control de sus territorios. A la luz de una revisión crítica de la literatura sobre memoria en geografía y análisis narrativo de entrevistas y documentos elaborados por grupos indígenas, propongo un marco conceptual para estudiar las llamadas protestas antineoliberales de los años 2008-2009 en la Amazonía peruana, usando teorías sobre la memoria colectiva y decolonialidad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".