MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966449059 · doi:10.47735/odia.2019.24.25

The Chronology of Tombs in Daeseong-dong in the Age of The early Dojil Pottery

2019· article· en· W2966449059 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pusan Archaeological Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotteryChronologyArchaeologyQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Ancient historyArtGeographyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Daeseong-dong Tumuli are located in the burial place of kings of Geumgwan Gaya. The study of grave goods reveals that Dojil pottery buried in large wooden chamber tombs reflect her heyday, hence the chronological dating of ancient tombs of the kingdom heavily relies upon the analysis of the period of Dojil pottery. The relative dating of the tombs in this area is used to arrange a variety of burial pottery, braziershaped stands with handles and mounted dishes, in chronological order. Brazier-shaped stands with handles are subdivided into two types: stands with an outward rolled rims and with upright mouths, and mounted dishes into three types: dishes with an outward bent rims, with an upright mouths, and with lids. This categorization of pottery found in large wooden chamber tombs suggests the several different periods of burial practices in wooden chamber tombs - six periods in this paper. With the comparison between pottery found in this area and those in Bokcheondong burial mounds, the analysis of differences between two super-categories of pottery provides a detailed chronology of burial pottery in the tombs. For example, based upon a comparative analysis with prestige goods imported from the central and northern regions of China, the absolute dating of burial materials gives a result that the third period of the tombs refers to the second quarter of the fourth century, and next three periods cover every 25 years from the third quarter of the fourth century to the first quarter of the fifth century. On the other hand, the chronological comparison between double layered mounted dishes with holes on its stand found in Tomb No. 39 and other pottery buried earlier reveals that the Tomb was built during the seventh period, the second quarter of the fifth century. Dojil pottery and brazier-shaped stands with handles were discovered for the first time in the first period of wooden chamber tombs. It was no later than the third period to see all kinds of pottery which were produced in unglazed style throughout tombs. The fourth period shows a variety of pottery including not only double layered mounted dishes with holes on its stand and lids, bowl stands, cylinder-shaped pottery stands, and lidded mounted jars, but also brazier-shaped pottery stands in which triangle and stripe patterns and circular compass patterns are inscribed discovered from large tombs. During the sixth period the typical pottery style of Gaya, like lidded long-necked jars and bowl stands on which larva patterns ingrained, was invented. From the seventh period, pottery continued to develop and created the new style of mounted dishes. The pottery style made during the sixth and seventh periods would have influenced burial vessels in Tomb No. 7 in Dongri, Changnyeong.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it