MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966523997 · doi:10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.14

Bile spillage should be avoided in elective cholecystectomy

2019· letter· en· W2966523997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Per Sandström, Bergþór Björnsson

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpillageCholecystectomyGeneral surgeryGallbladder diseaseGallbladderPopulationGallbladder cancerAdverse effectSurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with great interest the article entitled “Adverse Outcomes After Bile Spillage in Incidental Gallbladder Cancers: A Population-based Study” by Michael J. Horkoff et al ., which was e-published the 13th of April, 2019 in Annals of Surgery (1). This retrospective study was conducted by the University of Calgary and included all cholecystectomies performed from 2001–2015 in the region of Alberta, Canada. The aim of the study was to evaluate if bile spillage during the index operation for presumed benign gallstone disease would affect survival in the group of patients found to have incidental gallbladder cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatoBiliary Surgery and NutritionSame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207