MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966576554

Onset and development of the Drake Passage and Scotia Sea gateways and its influence on global ocean circulation and climate (IODP proposal)

2016· article· en· W2966576554 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. Javier Hernández‐Molina, Robert D Larter, Ellen Thomas, Lara F. Pérez, Graeme Eagles, Fernando Bohoyo, E. Lodolo, Xiaowei Xuan, Ian W. D. Dalziel, Dorrik A. V. Stow, Carlota Escutia, Jennifer F. Biddle, Willem P. Sijp, David S. Harwood, D.A. Tassone

Bibliographic record

VenueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyPeninsulaGeologyCircumpolar starNova scotiaGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The DRAKE-SCOTIA SEA GATEWAYS is a new multidisciplinary International Ocean Discovery
\nProgram (IODP) drilling proposal aimed at determining the time of opening and pattern of development of gateways in
\nthe Drake Passage and the adjacent Scotia Sea, and their influence on global ocean circulation, biotic evolution and
\nclimate. The Drake Passage with the adjacent Scotia Sea represent one of Earth’s most important oceanic gateways,
\nbetween the southern tip of South America and the Antarctic Peninsula, a crucial area for water mass exchange between
\nthe Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean and the Weddell Sea, the importance of which is evidence by in many
\nmultinational studies. Nevertheless, the region has not been yet drilled for scientific purposes. The objective of this work is to present the main scientific goals of this drilling proposal and its link with the IODP Science Plan for 2013-2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)Same topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207