MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966630780 · doi:10.1002/anie.201907486

Carboxyboronate: A Versatile C1 Building Block

2019· review· en· W2966630780 on OpenAlexafffund
Aleksandra Holownia, Chieh‐Hung Tien, Diego B. Diaz, Reed T. Larson, Andrei K. Yudin

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Synthesis and Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConnaught Fund
KeywordsBlock (permutation group theory)Computer scienceArchitectural engineeringMathematicsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis and applications of carboxy-MIDA-boronate, a novel C1 building block, are described. This molecule is accessible via a ruthenium tetraoxide-mediated cleavage of commercially available ethynyl-MIDA-boronate. In the course of this study, carboxy-MIDA-boronate was found to possess ambident reactivity towards nucleophiles. Carboxylic acid derivatization produces a broad range of previously unknown carbamoyl-, oxycarbo- and thiocarboboronates. Carboxy-MIDA-boronate and its derivatives undergo condensations to access borylated heterocycles with boron at positions that are difficult to access using alternate methods. The resulting heterocycles participate in the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction, enabling entry into diverse bis(heteroaryl) motifs. The carbon monoxide-releasing capacity of carboxy-MIDA-boronate was also examined and applied in palladium-catalyzed carbonylation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicChemical Synthesis and ReactionsFrench-language works237,207