The long noncoding RNA MALAT1 predicts human islet isolation quality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human islet isolation is a cost-/resource-intensive program generating islets for cell therapy in Type 1 diabetes. However, only a third of cadaveric pancreas get to clinical transplantation due to low quality/number of islets. There is a need to identify biomarker(s) that predict the quality of islets, prior to initiating their isolation. Here, we sequenced transcriptome from 18 human islet preparations stratified into three groups (Gr.1: Best quality/transplantable islets, Gr.2: Intermediary quality, Gr.3: Inferior quality/non-transplantable islets) based on routine measurements including islet purity/viability. Machine-learning algorithms involving penalized regression analyses identified 10 long-non-coding(lnc)RNAs significantly different across all group-wise comparisons (Gr1VsGr2, Gr2vsGr3, Gr1vsGr3). Two variants of Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript-1(MALAT1) lncRNA were common across all comparisons. We confirmed RNA-seq findings in a "validation set" of 75 human islet preparations. Finally, in 19 pancreas samples, we demonstrate that assessing the levels of MALAT1 variants alone (ROC curve AUC: 0.83) offers highest specificity in predicting post-isolation islet quality and improves the predictive potential for clinical islet transplantation when combined with Edmonton Donor Points/Body Mass Index(BMI)/North American Islet Donor Score(NAIDS). We present this resource of islet-quality-stratified lncRNA transcriptome data and identify MALAT1 as a biomarker that significantly enhances current selection methods for clinical (GMP)-grade islet isolation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it