MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966672751 · doi:10.1109/aicas.2019.8771573

Auto Generation of High-Performance Fixed-Point Multiplier for Artificial Neural Networks

2019· article· en· W2966672751 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Zhao, Zhongxia Shang, Yong Lian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplier (economics)AdderCritical path methodComputer scienceArtificial neural networkCMOSParallel computingAlgorithmComputer hardwareElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiplier is a critical building block in artificial neural network (ANN). The precision and connection structure of the multiplier should be optimized for an ANN to achieve the best energy, speed and area efficiency. Changes in ANN application and CMOS process often result in the redesign of the multiplier. This paper presents an auto generation method for high-performance fixed-point multiplier based on three techniques, i.e. Modified Booth Encoding (MBE) scheme, improved three-dimensional reduction method (ITDM) and mixed parallel pipelining (MPP). The MBE is customized for ReLU activation function based ANN to remove the sign bit of the multiplicand to save area. The ITDM further shorts the critical path by changing the position of half adder in the conventional TDM. The proposed MPP divides the structures into different stages for parallel and pipelined implementation. The auto generated multiplier speed is 4.04 times faster and the layout is 29% denser and more regular than the conventional MBE combining with TDM method based multiplier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207