MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966734724 · doi:10.5539/jas.v11n14p161

Irrigation as Strengthening of Smallholder in the Municipality of Salto do Lontra

2019· article· en· W2966734724 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diane Aparecida Ostroski, Marcio A. Vilas-Boas, Mariângela Pierucinni, Ana Claudia Guedes Silva, Allan Remor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)AgricultureBusinessProductivityIrrigationOrder (exchange)Openness to experienceProcess (computing)Agricultural scienceNatural resource economicsEconomic growthGeographyEconomicsEcologyFinanceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The irrigation technology for smallholder agriculture is an important instrument to increasing both productivity and income. However for the incorporation of this technology to succeed into small properties, there is a need for interlocution among the different spheres of coordination of these economic agents. In this way, the main objective of this work was to analyze the participation of the institutional and organizational environments of the district of Salto do Lontra, located in the southwestern region of Parana state, in both the dissemination and strengthening of irrigation. This region has the highest concentration of smallholders in the state, hence its relevance. A detailed analysis of the organizational environment was made, in which interviews to the representatives of the organizations werw inserted in the management process of this sector. In order to identify the efficiency of organizations and the accessibility of public credit policies, questionnaires were applied to 35 irrigating smallholders, considering local customs, values and skills. The results demonstrated that the credit policy obtained by the public authority corroborates for the permanence of this economic and social agent in the field. However, organizations work individually, without synchronizing the needs of the category. On the other hand highlighting the universities, which proved to be strong disseminators of irrigation technology locally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicRural Development and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207