MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966750892 · doi:10.1109/isie.2019.8781330

Hybrid State of Charge Estimation Approach for Lithium-ion Batteries using k-Nearest Neighbour and Gaussian Filter-based Error Cancellation

2019· article· en· W2966750892 on OpenAlexaff
Manjot S. Sidhu, Deepak Ronanki, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState of chargeBattery (electricity)Computer scienceGaussianLithium (medication)VoltageEnergy (signal processing)Lithium-ion batteryAutomotive engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)MathematicsChemistryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries have emerged as a mainstream source to store energy in electrified vehicles due to pivotal features of high energy density, long cycle life and low self-discharge. The continuous monitoring of state of charge (SOC) of a lithium-ion battery is essential to avoid over-charging or over-discharging in order to ensure safe operation as well as to reduce its average life cycle cost. However, an accurate SOC estimation of lithiumion battery has become a major challenge in the automotive industry. In this paper, k-nearest neighbours (kNN) concept have been employed to estimate the SOC, based on the measured voltage, current and previous SOC. A Gaussian filter is employed to minimize the errors in the kNN-based SOC estimation. The effectiveness of the proposed hybrid method is verified on the experimental data of the lithium-ion battery under different standard driving schedules and temperatures. Results show that the proposed hybrid approach outperforms other conventional SOC approaches with better accuracy under federal urban and highway driving schedules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207