Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Patients: Characteristics of Disease in EBV-seropositive Recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients at greatest risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are those who acquire primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection after solid organ transplantation. The incidence of PTLD among patients who are EBV-seropositive before transplant is lower, and little is known about the differences in presentation and outcome of this population. We describe the characteristics of EBV-seropositive transplant recipients (R+) who developed PTLD and compare survival outcomes with EBV-seronegative recipients (R-). METHODS: A hospital-based registry was used to identify all patients with biopsy-proven PTLD for the period 2000-2014. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between R+ and R- patients with PTLD. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included, among which 20 (29.0%) were R+ and 49 (71.0%) were R-. Multiorgan transplant patients accounted for 25% of PTLD cases in R+ patients, while accounting for only 2.1% of all transplants during the study period. There was no difference in PTLD site between R+ and R- patients. PTLD among R+ individuals occurred during the second year after transplant (median: 1.92; range: 0.35-3.09 y) compared with during the first year for R- individuals (median: 0.95; range: 0.48-2.92 y; P = 0.380). There was a trend for a higher overall mortality among R+ individuals (log rank: 0.09). PTLD-related mortality did not differ between R+ and R- individuals (log rank: 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: PTLD among R+ individuals was more likely to occur among multiorgan recipients, and there was a tendency for poorer outcomes at 1 and 5 years after the diagnosis of PTLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".