MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966800298 · doi:10.1109/isie.2019.8781116

Computationally Efficient Adaptive Model Predictive Control for Constrained Linear Systems with Parametric Uncertainties

2019· article· en· W2966800298 on OpenAlexaff
Kunwu Zhang, Changxin Liu, Yang Shi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlMathematical optimizationEstimatorControl theory (sociology)Multiplicative functionParametric statisticsComputer scienceHomothetic transformationAdaptive estimatorSequence (biology)Linear systemMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates adaptive model predictive control (MPC) for constrained linear systems subject to multiplicative uncertainties. Different from robust MPC considering the worst-case disturbances, the proposed solution updates the unknown system model online based on input and state histories. We firstly propose a parameter estimator based on recursive least square technique, which guarantees the nonincreasing estimator error and a contractive sequence of uncertainty sets. Then a computationally tractable adaptive MPC method is developed to handle the multiplicative uncertainties directly by using the polytopic tube. Instead of designing the tube offline, we consider the homothetic tube in this work, where the tube parameters are the MPC optimization problem. This strategy allows that the tube can be optimized based on the updated system model to reduce the conservatism. We have proved that the proposed adaptive MPC method is recursively feasible and the closed-loop system is asymptotically stable. Finally, a numerical example is given to evaluate the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207