Bibliographic record
Abstract
La laicite est une condition necessaire, sinon suffisante, a l’exercice des droits humains fondamentaux des femmes. Elle est egalement une condition necessaire a l’exercice de la democratie, selon laquelle les lois sont votees par le peuple et amendables de part la volonte du peuple, et non figees pour toujours selon des decrets supposes divins interpretes par des humains le plus souvent reactionnaires. La politique communautariste d’une partie de l’Europe se fonde sur une re-definition de la laicite (en tant que separation des religions et du pouvoir politique), en la remplacant par celle d’egale tolerance des gouvernements vis a vis de toutes les religions. Ce systeme qui privilegie les droits des communautes aux depens de ceux des citoyens supposes y appartenir (et souvent enjoints de le faire) soutient de fait les fondamentalistes qui oeuvrent contre la democracie, pour l’instauration de theocracies. Certes, la laicite a elle seule ne peut garantir les droits des femmes, mais elle est essentielle pour que le fondamentalisme religieux cesse d’empieter sur leurs droits en particulier et sur la democratie en general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".