MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966847339 · doi:10.1145/3340257

A Second-Order Advection-Reflection Solver

2019· article· en· W2966847339 on OpenAlexafffund
Rahul Narain, Jonas Zehnder, Bernhard Thomaszewski

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAdobe Systems
KeywordsAdvectionSolverReflection (computer programming)DissipationMidpointSimple (philosophy)Scheme (mathematics)Connection (principal bundle)Computer scienceOrder (exchange)Applied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematicsAlgorithmGeometryMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zehnder et al. [2018] recently introduced an advection-reflection method for fluid simulation that dramatically reduces artificial dissipation. We establish a connection between their method and the implicit midpoint time integration scheme, and present a simple modification to obtain an advection-reflection scheme with second-order accuracy in time. We compare with existing alternatives, including a second-order semi-Lagrangian method based on BDF2, and demonstrate the improved energy-preservation properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive TechniquesSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207