The Utility of the Early Postoperative Follow-up and Radiographs After Operative Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are common elbow injuries in pediatric patients. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons published guidelines for the standard of care in the treatment of displaced SCH fractures, however, no recommendations for follow-up care were made. With the recent push to eliminate unnecessary radiographs and decrease health care costs, many are questioning postoperative protocols. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the utility of the 1-week follow-up appointment after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of displaced SCH fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review performed at a single institution from 2014 to 2016 included patients under 14 years of age with a closed, displaced SCH fracture treated with CRPP. Exclusion criteria included patients without complete clinical or radiographic follow-up. Variables examined included time to initial follow-up, change in treatment plan after 1-week x-rays, complications, demographics, fracture type, pin number and configuration, reduction parameters, immobilization, time to pin removal, duration of casting, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients were divided into 2 groups based on time to initial follow-up. Overall, 368 had an initial follow-up at 7 to 10 days (group 1) and 44 at 21 to 28 days (group 2). There was no difference in age, sex, fracture type, pin configuration, or a number of pins between groups. Statistically significant findings included time to initial follow-up and days to pin removal (group 1 at 26.2 d vs. group 2 at 23.8 d), type of immobilization (group 1 with 5% circumferential casts and group 2 with 70%), and time to surgery (26.2 vs. 62.9 h, respectively). There was no significant difference in complication rates and only a 0.5% rate of change in management in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative follow-up and radiographs did not change the patient outcome and might be eliminated in children with displaced SCH fractures treated with CRPP. Given the current focus of on efficiency and cost-effective care, eliminating the 1-week postoperative appointment would improve appointment availability and decrease medical cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Therapeutic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".