MétaCan
← all works

Effect of Goose Removals on a Suburban Canada Goose Population

2009· article· en· 0 citations· W2966893097 on OpenAlex

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: about_only · design weight: 3321.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Evaluation of a goose removal program; wildlife management.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The study evaluates goose-removal effects on an animal population, not research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Wildlife management experiment on suburban Canada goose removals; ecology and pest control.

Abstract

Local-nesting or "resident" Canada geese (Branta canadensis) are coming into conflict with people and human activities in urban-suburban areas throughout North America. Capture and removal of molting geese, followed by translocation or euthanasia, is a simple way to reduce the number of geese in an area, but some critics of lethal goose control methods claim that other geese will quickly fill the void left when geese are removed from a problem area. To better understand the effectiveness of urban-suburban goose removal programs, we captured 591 resident geese (mostly adult birds) in suburban Rockland County, New York, during the summer molt, 2004 and 2005. The birds were transported, marked with neck and leg bands and released in a rural area approximately 320 km to the northwest. Band returns indicated that at least 46% of translocated geese were eventually harvested by hunters, most of those (52%) during the first September hunting season after release, and most (72%) were taken within 50 km of the release site. Neckband observations indicated that <10% of translocated birds returned to Rockland County, and few (<1%) moved to suburban areas near the release site. Annual molting period goose surveys throughout Rockland County from 2004- 2008 indicated that removal of geese from selected sites in Clarkstown resulted in nearly 60% fewer geese town wide for three subsequent years, and other geese did not quickly move in to replace birds that we removed. This study demonstrated that goose removal can be an effective way to reduce local goose populations in some areas for at least three years.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
Utah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University)
Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Field
Environmental Science
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
GooseGeographyPopulationFisheryEcologyBiologyDemography
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes