MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Effect of Goose Removals on a Suburban Canada Goose Population

2009· article· en· 0 citations· W2966893097 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Porte sur le CanadaSon objet est le Canada, où que soient ses auteurs.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : about_only · poids de sondage : 3321.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Evaluation of a goose removal program; wildlife management.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

The study evaluates goose-removal effects on an animal population, not research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Wildlife management experiment on suburban Canada goose removals; ecology and pest control.

Résumé

Local-nesting or "resident" Canada geese (Branta canadensis) are coming into conflict with people and human activities in urban-suburban areas throughout North America. Capture and removal of molting geese, followed by translocation or euthanasia, is a simple way to reduce the number of geese in an area, but some critics of lethal goose control methods claim that other geese will quickly fill the void left when geese are removed from a problem area. To better understand the effectiveness of urban-suburban goose removal programs, we captured 591 resident geese (mostly adult birds) in suburban Rockland County, New York, during the summer molt, 2004 and 2005. The birds were transported, marked with neck and leg bands and released in a rural area approximately 320 km to the northwest. Band returns indicated that at least 46% of translocated geese were eventually harvested by hunters, most of those (52%) during the first September hunting season after release, and most (72%) were taken within 50 km of the release site. Neckband observations indicated that <10% of translocated birds returned to Rockland County, and few (<1%) moved to suburban areas near the release site. Annual molting period goose surveys throughout Rockland County from 2004- 2008 indicated that removal of geese from selected sites in Clarkstown resulted in nearly 60% fewer geese town wide for three subsequent years, and other geese did not quickly move in to replace birds that we removed. This study demonstrated that goose removal can be an effective way to reduce local goose populations in some areas for at least three years.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Utah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University)
Thématique
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Domaine
Environmental Science
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
GooseGeographyPopulationFisheryEcologyBiologyDemography
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui