MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966956762 · doi:10.1109/cec.2019.8789894

Enhancing LQR Controller Using Optimized Real-time System by GDE3 and NSGA-II Algorithms and Comparing with Conventional Method

2019· article· en· W2966956762 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSortingReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceLinear-quadratic regulatorGenetic algorithmController (irrigation)Control (management)A priori and a posterioriDifferential evolutionOptimal controlAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Control algorithms are essential in the modern world to tackle with ever-changing environmental disturbances while meeting adequate safety standards. Control systems must be appropriately tuned for each application to ensure reliability and safety. This paper applies a multi-objective optimization method, Generalized Differential Evolution (GDE3), to tune a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) while enabling posteriori decision-making. The utilized case study is the aircraft pitch control. We compare the results of GDE3 with Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and conventional tuning. The current findings show that the GDE3 performs better than the other methods. This paper sheds light on how trade-off and condition-specific based optimization can enhance real-time control systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207