MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966977139 · doi:10.3968/11116

Re-understanding of the Marxist Monopoly Capital Theory in the New Period

2019· article· en· W2966977139 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yang Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElite Sociology and Global Capitalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopolyCapitalismMarxist philosophyEconomicsCapital (architecture)Neoclassical economicsMultinational corporationMarket economyCapital accumulationNatural monopolyEconomic systemLawPolitical scienceProfit (economics)FinancePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marxist monopoly capital theory originated from Marx’s monopoly thought in “Capital” and other works. On the basis of predecessors, Lenin inherited and developed Marx and others’ understanding of monopoly capitalism and formed a more systematic Marxist Monopoly capital theory. In the new era, monopoly capitalism has shown new characteristics: the globalization of monopoly capital has deepened; the new carrier of monopoly organizations - multinational corporations comprehensively control the global economy; antitrust with the monopoly. At the same time, the new stage of monopoly capitalism has also exposed new contradictions: the polarization between the rich and the poor is serious; the hollowing out of the real economy and the excessive expansion of the virtual economy; overproduction and insufficient demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.031
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicElite Sociology and Global CapitalismFrench-language works237,207