MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967031885 · doi:10.1109/stict.2019.8789375

Greening The Network Using Traffic Prediction and Link Rate Adaptation

2019· article· en· W2967031885 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdolkhalegh Bayati, Kim Khoa Nguyen, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionEfficient energy useSimulated annealingLink (geometry)Traffic generation modelHeuristicReal-time computingMathematical optimizationComputer networkAlgorithmEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Link rate adaptation is an effective means to save energy consumption of network elements by adjusting the link rate according to the carried traffic through a network-level optimization of the flow allocation process. Unfortunately, current adaptation approaches are mainly reactive, in which link speed is changed only when new traffic demand is requested. Once bandwidth has been allocated for a demand, link rate remains constant during the entire session. This approach may result in sub-optimal energy efficiency schemes and requires multiple re-optimizations as traffic flows are fluctuating during the session, hence reducing the overall network performance. In this paper, we propose a multiple-step-ahead method to predictively optimize link rates based on forecasting traffic demand. We formulate the link adaptive energy efficiency as a MIP model and propose a heuristic simulated annealing algorithm to solve it. Our experimental results show our approach provides energy saving while it significantly decreases the number of re-optimizations in the energy-aware routing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207