MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967032857 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.018

BSCI-20. THERAPEUTIC TARGETING OF HLA-G IN BRAIN METASTASES

2019· article· en· W2967032857 on OpenAlexaff
Sheila K. Singh, Blessing Bassey‐Archibong, Nikoo Aghaei, Agata Kieliszek, Chitra Venugopal, Chirayu Chokshi, Neil Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain metastasisMelanomaMedicineBreast cancerLungCancer researchMetastasisRadiosurgeryHuman leukocyte antigenOncologyLung cancerCancerPathologyInternal medicineImmunologyRadiation therapyAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain metastases (BM) are the most common brain tumor in adults, with an incidence ten times greater than that of primary brain tumors. The most common sources of BM in adult cancer patients include cancers of the lung, breast and melanoma, which together account for almost 80% of all BM. Current clinical modalities for BM include surgery, whole brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery but these therapies still offer limited efficacy and reduced survival of only months in treated patients, emphasizing the need for novel BM research approaches and better therapeutic strategies. Our laboratory recently discovered that stem-like cells exist in patient-derived BM from lung, breast and melanoma cancers, which we termed “brain metastasis-initiating cells” or BMICs. Through clinically relevant human-mouse xenograft models established with these patient-derived BMICs, we captured lung, breast and melanoma BMICs at pre-metastasis – a key stage where circulating metastatic cells extravasate and initially seed the brain, prior to organization into micro-metastatic foci. Transcriptome analysis of pre-metastatic BMICs revealed a unique genetic profile and several genes commonly up-regulated among lung, breast and melanoma BM, including the non-classical human leukocyte class I antigen-G (HLA-G). Loss of HLA-G in lung, breast and melanoma BMICs using two HLA-G specific shRNAs attenuated sphere formation, migratory and tumor initiating abilities of lung, breast and melanoma BMICs compared to control BMICs. HLA-G knockdown also resulted in reduced phospho(p)-STAT3 expression in patient-derived BMICs suggesting a potential cooperative role between HLA-G and pSTAT3 in BM. Since HLA-G is highly expressed at the cell surface in control tumors, ongoing experiments are focused on developing HLA-G specific chimeric antigen receptor -T cells (CAR-Ts) and determining their efficacy in targeting lung-, breast- and melanoma-BM as blocking the brain metastatic process will markedly extend patient survival and ultimately transform a fatal systemic disease into a more treatable one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207