Formas estéticas de habitar: las tiendas de barrio como escenario social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
en Medellín, como en el resto de ciudades de Colombia, las tiendas de barrio son un escenario privilegiado para la interacción social en la vida cotidiana. Su proliferación en la cuidad configura un laboratorio en torno al espacio practicado, cuyos esquemas tipificadores favorecen los encuentros cara a cara, marcan las coordenadas de la intersubjetividad de la vida vecinal y configuran un modelo alternativo de cómo se humaniza el espacio, del tránsito entre lo dominante a lo apropiado, de lo mental a lo vivido y de la táctica a la estrategia. Una mirada culturalista que dialoga con la estética del habitar, reivindica el papel protagónico que tienen para la construcción de distintas socialidades, ritualidades y prácticas de intercambio cotidianas. Se exalta el valor como lugares apropiados construidos lejos de la oficialidad, la homogenización y los modelos abstractos concebidos por arquitectos y urbanistas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".