MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967115755 · doi:10.1353/dtc.2019.0012

The Rise of the Diva on the Sixteenth Century Commedia dell’Arte Stage by Rosalind Kerr

2019· article· en· W2967115755 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Schmitt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of dramatic theory and criticism · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtDivaStyle (visual arts)NarrativeLiteraturePopularityArt historyCarnivalesqueArgument (complex analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Rise of the Diva on the Sixteenth Century Commedia dell’Arte Stage by Rosalind Kerr Julia Schmitt The Rise of the Diva on the Sixteenth Century Commedia dell’Arte Stage. By Rosalind Kerr. University of Toronto Press, 2015. Cloth $65.00. 216 pages. In The Rise of the Diva on the Sixteenth Century Commedia dell’Arte Stage, Rosalind Kerr traces the journey of Italian actresses from their earliest inclusions in mountebank-style performances to their achievement as celebrity icons headlining professional Commedia troupes. Through this examination, Kerr aims to illustrate the numerous ways that these actresses were able to make commodification work in their favor. Kerr’s primary argument is that “through their creations of unforgettable female characters and their invention of a new mimetic acting style, the Italian actresses revolutionized the early modern Western stage” (12). Relying largely on primary texts from the period and on theories derived from psychoanalysis and fame studies, Kerr reclaims sixteenth-century Italian actresses as more than just an extension of the already heavily-judged category of “courtesan.” Within this body of work, Kerr re-positions these actresses as empowered women who were able to control their own narratives, either as actresses in an improvised style of performance or as published authors. Chapter 1, “The Early Female Performer as Marketplace Fetish,” chronicles the ways in which actresses were “marketed” in popular theatre (4). Despite the church’s (and other antitheatricalists’) attempts to have women removed as performers, these actresses remained onstage due to their popularity with fellow company members and an adoring (paying) public (34–35). In chapter 2, “Pornographic Bawds, Courtesans, and Maidservants,” Kerr argues that the improvised nature of Commedia performances allowed actresses greater subjectivity (7), and that certain maidservant roles in Commedia were fleshed out with dialogue and gestures, which in turn offered a complex response to the economic realities of the maid’s position as a circulating sexual object (54). These first two chapters rely heavily on Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytic theory (along with feminist critiques of both), to lay claim to the fact that many Italian actresses were active participants in promoting themselves as objects of fetishization. Chapter 3, entitled “Iconic Prima Donnas,” uses theories of fame and celebrity (primarily espoused by Joseph Roach) to demonstrate the ways in which four actresses achieved “iconic” status. By cultivating their own celebrity, these actresses elevated themselves to even greater heights of popularity among both the masses and elites, thereby transforming the Commedia dell’Arte into a legitimate new art form (81). Chapter 4, “Transvestite Heroines,” looks closely at actresses who appeared on stage dressed as male courtiers and how they were positioned to tease the spectator with sexual ambiguity and phallic power (82). The word transvestite is used by Kerr to describe actresses that impersonated men onstage, and Kerr argues that these transvestite performances helped to frame sexual identity as a non-binary construct (101). A great example of Kerr’s feminist take on the Divas in general may be found in her analysis of [End Page 123] their roles as transvestite performers: “the actresses were empowered to represent females who used their transvestite disguises to challenge male privilege and notions of sexual difference” (149). Famed Commedia performer Isabella Andreini encompasses the focus of chapter 5, “Isabella Andreini: The Making of a Diva.” In this chapter, Kerr argues that Andreini achieved a kind of celebrity worship by maintaining her authentic self onstage (103), and by remaining influential long after her death (127–137). Kerr neatly and succinctly summarizes several psychoanalytic theories related to fetishization, “lack,” and jokes in general, but the subject matter may still prove to be too difficult for a profound understanding at the undergraduate level. The book feels more suited to a graduate seminar style course, and could also serve as an outstanding academic source for any research project tangential to the topics of Commedia dell’Arte, actresses in general, and/or the act of representation. By far, the book’s greatest strength lies in Kerr’s meticulous reading of primary texts from the period. The arguments of the book are grounded in literary texts, Commedia scenarios, poems, reviews, epigraphs, and personal letters, and Kerr...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of dramatic theory and criticismSame topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207