Estudio del género Lactarius Pers. (fungi, basidiomycotina, russulales) en México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se realiza un estudio taxonomico y corologico del genero Lactarius Pers. (perteneciente al orden Agaricales, filum Basidiomycota) en Mexico. Tras este estudio, se reconocen en Mexico un total de 70 especies de Lactarius (que incluyen 15 taxones infraespecificos), 32 de las cuales corresponden a nuevos registros para el pais. Lactarius Lacteolutescens se propuso como nueva para la ciencia y, junto con L.chiapanensis, L.mexicanus y L.veraecrucis, son hasta ahora conocidas solamente de Mexico. La mayoria de los representantes del genero que se desarrollan en el pais corresponden a taxones descritos de America y en menor numero de Europa y Asia. La presente contribucion permitio ampliar el conocimiento de la distribucion geografica de varias especies, hasta ahora poco conocidas. Por ejemplo: L.areolatus, L.barrowsii, L.caespitosus, L.caeruleintinctus, L.deceptivus, L.floriadanus, L.fragilis, L.fuliginellus, L.fumaecolor, L.fumosus, L.furcatus, L.luculentus, L.maculatipes, L.minusculus, L.mutabilis, L.neuhoffi, L.paradoxus, L.rimosellus, L.rufulus, L.salmoneus var.curtisii, L.subpalustris, L.sublacustris y L.vinaceosporus entre otras, solo se conocian de los Estados Unidos y algunas tambien de Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".