MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967220060 · doi:10.4000/assr.44915

Nedim Gürsel, La seconde vie de Mahomet. Le Prophète dans la littérature

2018· article· fr· W2967220060 on OpenAlexaff
John Tolan

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives de sciences sociales des religions · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsAssociation Québécoise des Enseignantes et des Enseignants du Primaire
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nedim Gürsel, romancier et essayiste turc, directeur de recherche au CNRS et enseignant à l'INALCO, livre une étude de divers portraits de Muhammad dans la littérature.Ainsi, explique-t-il, le Prophète après sa mort vit une « seconde vie » dans les légendes et les textes littéraires.Plusieurs vies, serait-on tenté d'ajouter, tant les portraits présentés divergent les uns des autres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives de sciences sociales des religionsSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207