MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967337318 · doi:10.1364/boe.10.004607

Development of a stand-alone DCS system for monitoring absolute cerebral blood flow

2019· article· en· W2967337318 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahro Khalid, Daniel Milej, Ajay Rajaram, Androu Abdalmalak, Laura Morrison, Mamadou Diop, Keith St. Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDiffuse optical imagingCerebral blood flowBlood flowBiomedical engineeringMeasure (data warehouse)SpectroscopyComputer scienceOptical imagingNear-infrared spectroscopyOpticsMaterials scienceBiological systemMedicinePhysicsArtificial intelligenceCardiologyIterative reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a noninvasive optical technique for monitoring cerebral blood flow (CBF). This work presents a stand-alone DCS system capable of monitoring absolute CBF by incorporating a quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) technique. Multi-distance data were acquired to measure the tissue optical properties and to perform DCE experiments. Feasibility of the technique was assessed in piglets in which the optical properties were measured independently by time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy. A strong linear correlation was observed between CBF values derived using the two sets of optical properties, demonstrating that this hybrid DCS approach can provide real-time monitoring of absolute CBF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Optics ExpressSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207