MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967358240 · doi:10.7202/1060816ar

Théâtre à Montréal, 1825-1930 : un récit visuel mettant en scène des documents patrimoniaux

2019· article· fr· W2967358240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur présente un projet de recherche-diffusion sur l’histoire culturelle, sociale et commerciale d’une quarantaine de lieux de théâtre montréalais actifs entre 1825 et 1930, réalisé en partenariat avec le Laboratoire d’histoire et de patrimoine de Montréal (LHPM) de l’UQAM. Puisant à la fois dans le patrimoine documentaire publié et les documents d’archives détenus par Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, ces travaux ont suscité la création de deux projets de diffusion complémentaires. Une collection a d’abord été créée au printemps 2017 dans Historypin, pour être ensuite déployée en près de deux cents images et capsules textuelles dans un parcours structuré porté par une autre plateforme Web, Story Maps. L’auteur commente ici la portée du projet, sa méthodologie et ses retombées documentaires. Les mérites respectifs des deux plateformes utilisées sont également mis en relief.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it