MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967407995 · doi:10.1111/add.14774

Identification and characterization of latent classes based on drug use among men who have sex with men at risk of sexually transmitted infections in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2019· article· en· W2967407995 on OpenAlexaff
Roel Achterbergh, Henry J.C. de Vries, Anders Boyd, Udi Davidovich, Susanne Drückler, Elske Hoornenborg, Maria Prins, Amy Matser

Bibliographic record

VenueAddiction · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersRijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en MilieuStichting Sanquin BloedvoorzieningUniversiteit van AmsterdamZonMw
KeywordsIdentification (biology)DrugLatent class modelMedicinePsychiatryBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for both drug use and sexually transmitted infections (STI). We aimed to (1) identify subgroups of drug use during sex among MSM in Amsterdam and after classifying participants and (2) compare sexual behaviour and STI across groups. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups with similar drug use patterns, between which sexual behaviour and STI prevalence were compared. SETTING: Four different studies conducted at the STI out-patient clinic in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between January 2014 and June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1130 self-declared MSM, aged ≥ 18 years. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported drug use, laboratory-confirmed STI, socio-demographics, sexual behaviour (including number of partners), condom use. FINDINGS: Median age was 40 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 32-47]. We identified five latent classes of users, which we labelled: 'no substance' (n = 162), 'alcohol' (n = 159), 'nitrites and erectile dysfunction drugs (EDD)' (n = 286), 'polydrug' (n = 257) and 'chems' (n = 266). Median number of sex partners significantly differed across classes (P < 0.001), ranging from two (IQR = 1-6) in the 'no substance' class to 20 (IQR = 10-45) in the 'chems' class. The proportion of MSM reporting condomless anal sex also differed across classes (P < 0.001), ranging from 45.6% in the 'no substance' class to 86.5% in the 'chems' class. Compared with the 'no substance' class, the odds of STI were 3.9-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-14.4] higher in the 'alcohol' class, 8.9-fold (95% CI = 2.7-29.2) higher in the 'nitrites and EDD' class, 12.8-fold (95% CI = 3.9-41.9) higher in the 'polydrug' class and 15.0-fold (95% CI = 4.6-48.8) higher in the 'chems' class. CONCLUSION: There are five distinct classes of drug use in a sexual context among men who have sex with men in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Classes with higher levels of drug use appear to coincide with higher levels of sexual risk behaviour and sexually transmitted infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAddictionSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207