MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967413755 · doi:10.1063/1.5124251

The dual pair (Uq(su(1,1)),oq1/2(2n)), <i>q</i>-oscillators, and Askey-Wilson algebras

2020· article· en· W2967413755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCentralizer and normalizerDual (grammatical number)Rank (graph theory)Extension (predicate logic)Dual pairAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The universal Askey–Wilson algebra AW(3) can be obtained as the commutant of Uq(su(1,1)) in Uq(su(1,1))⊗3. We analyze the commutant of oq1/2(2)⊕oq1/2(2)⊕oq1/2(2) in q-oscillator representations of oq1/2(6) and show that it also realizes AW(3). These two pictures of AW(3) are shown to be dual in the sense of Howe; this is made clear by highlighting the role of the intermediate Casimir elements of each member of the dual pair Uq(su(1,1)),oq1/2(6). We also generalize these results. A higher rank extension of the Askey–Wilson algebra denoted AW(n) can be defined as the commutant of Uq(su(1,1)) in Uq(su(1,1))⊗n, and a dual description of AW(n) as the commutant of oq1/2(2)⊕n in q-oscillator representations of oq1/2(2n) is offered by calling upon the dual pair Uq(su(1,1)),oq1/2(2n).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it